growth of the middle class
Monday, March 31st, 2008it’s amazing what happens when you blog everyday. all 3 of my readers sent in a comment! that’s 100% participation - fuck you NYT! Tombo doesn’t count, since his response to everyone is to blog about how they aren’t right about something.
2/3rds of the comments had to do with the middle class though (as was Tom’s skeptic analysis post), so I thought I’d clarify my point. now, a true hardcore blogger would just keep yapping about whatever else comes to mind, and not revisit old topics to address varying comments, but since the purpose of this whole exercise was to help me communicate better, and not to improve the world by sharing my knowledge (like Tom), I thought it ok to come back to this, to practice adding definition to ambiguity.
so anyway, the middle class - I said it was growing. this is the kind of statement you can never rebuke, or unfortunately, truly support. the reason, is because there exists no objective definition of the term. even wikipedia starts it’s entry by calling it an ambiguous definition. income sounds like it should be an easy indicator, but it’s really not, since in a global economy, your purchasing power is in constant flux, and then there is inflation, taxes, etc. social position and education can be inserted into the analysis, but even that quickly snowballs into a horrible discussion of regional culture, and relative impact (literary PhD in the ghetto probably doesn’t get a lot of respect). ultimately, you end up have to paint the population with a wide brush, and significant overlap occurs.
my definition, while just as loose and ambiguous, is a little easier to apply. if you aren’t worried about how you are getting your next meal, paying your rent/mortgage, and have reasonably stable employment, then you aren’t poor. if you have to make choices about what types of indulgences you entertain, then you aren’t rich. if you are one of the 50% of the population who fall between these lines, welcome to the middle class.
I do believe that there is a mental component to this as well. especially when it comes to climbing out of the ‘poor’ label. assuming that you aren’t encumbered by unreasonable load (3 kids, no legs, etc.), a big part of going from poor to middle should be a matter of choice. if you are an army of one, you should be able to move to where you add value, then work enough jobs to not be poor (which as defined above, means you can eat lunch at work, then go home to sleep for an hour before you head off for job #3). once you train your mind to accept this punishment, it’s hard to slip back into poor territory. being rich takes a little more of everything - you can only work so many minimum wage jobs, and there aren’t enough hours in the day to get rich that way. even guys that make serious cash like the G can still be classified middle class, since it takes all his hours to make his money, and his only entertainment is online dating, and beer drinking - hardly aristocratic. no, being rich is retraining yourself to get over the self serving attitude of ‘learning to fish,’ and somehow getting other people to fish for you - the serve me attitude. because this turns class into more of a lifestyle, once you achieve a rung on the ladder, it’s pretty hard to go back down.
so, where is the growth? well, it’s all a matter of applying labels. who wants to turn poor people into middle class people? anyone who wants to convince you that you are better off than you really are. government, big business (walmart, costco, kmart and all their psuedo-luxury goods). who doesn’t want to be identified as rich? people just crossing over who don’t want to leave their family behind, or don’t want the burden of carrying their family with them for one. another group are the ones that just quit while they are ahead - uppper middle class that are ready to be comfortable. and of course, those that choose to spend their time in other ways - stop to have a family, take care of others, etc. the growth comes from expanding the coverage of the label for propaganda, and from those that just aren’t leaving the middle due to choice. also, if you are making a lot of money, but through traditional means, you end up carrying a larger tax burden (such as AMT). it you are earning money but just paying more taxes, you aren’t rich.
**interestingly, Tom debates my assertion, by pointing out that the gap between rich and poor is growing. coincidentally, that which lies in between 2 things, is often referred to a, “the middle.”
my point of course wasn’t that a middle class exists, or that it’s growing or shrinking. I was simply stating that while existing in the middle, your life can go stagnant. this can be a matter of being born in the middle and not doing any climbing of your own (most of the rock - the mob mentality), running out of gas climbing the ladder (the middle is pretty long section of ladder) and just settling in, or simply just not having what it takes, or getting lucky enough to break through to the next level (rich - it’s not for everyone.) when you stop climbing (or have never climbed), it’s easy to forget that getting to where you were involved choice and sacrifice. if you want to continue to climb, you have be ready to have that as part of your life again - what are you willing to give up to get more? especially on the rock, where you have 30 somethings who live with mom & dad, work decent jobs, but spend all their money on cars, beers, and trips to vegas. instead of using their shortcut to the middle as a tactical advantage to climbing higher, they live with a sense of entitlement, and make choices that cement their position in the middle class. when they become adults and parents, this warped sense of value turns into a misconstrued view of right and wrong, and they start to draw new class lines (us and them). this self segregation by the middle is what builds the walls! while the P is the current target of the middle class rage, you better believe the the Sons of I are also a target - it doesn’t matter what the upper thinks about the middle. this is some Booker T. Washington shit now - you can’t hold a man down unless you stay down with him! Booker T., born a half breed slave, who worked his way up to become first leader of Tuskegee University (too much work though - died of exhaustion at 59 - climbing the ladder is tough!)
here’s another interesting way to look at it - for all these people in the middle who see the upper class as elitist or snobbish, how many of them are reaching back to help their low income cousins? how many of them are acting in a way they feel these upper income snobs should be treating them?
in any case, the thickness of the middle ensures there will be all types. I’m in the middle, and probably going to stay there unless we leave the rock, I decide to not be an active parent, and treat my wife like a slave - so mostly by choice. others will stay there because it’s all they are capable of, but the ones I would just like to tone it down a bit, are those that can’t figure out who in their right mind would pay $17,000/ yr for a world class education for their kids, when vegas is just a jackpot away from putting them on easy street!
and just to get back to some numbers, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of families in the statistical middle of the income distribution tables has gone down, but so has the number of people in the poor bracket - so looking at earnings alone shows that the upper class is actually doing the growing.
my horse beating opinion however remains, that just making money doesn’t make you rich, just like nice rims on your honda doesn’t make your mom disappear from the master bedroom you are waiting to move into.