Archive for January, 2007

people I hate at the store

Monday, January 29th, 2007

1)  Lady (or ladies) who pay by check

it’s always a lady - not necessarily old.  somehow, with all the fucking gadgets she has with her, she still feels the need to longhand a fucking draft note to pay for her $6 of goods.  old ladies will also rub it in by flashing the ‘check approval’ card they got 30 years ago, right after they invented paper money.  more and more this one is becoming uniquely hawaiian, but dammit if it doesn’t ALWAYS happen to me when I just can’t stand being in the store 1 more second.  the fact that most stores just scan the check then hand it back would be a sign that it’s time to dump the checkbook, but no - some feeling of control will be lost if the convert to plastic.  morons.

(more…)

bloggin’ ain’t ez

Monday, January 29th, 2007

man - fell into the ’start too many drafts’ trap again. over editing and poor follow through has made the blog stale, and lacking in content. not even a movie review in the last week! damn! I risk the ire of the Tom.

(more…)

recap - look forward

Wednesday, January 24th, 2007

wow - time flies when you are living life.  it keeps going even when you aren’t.

big things in store, but I thought since I hadn’t posted in a while, I should at least put in some markers so I am forced to come back and fill in the blanks.

Tom has started the official book club (spurred by G-thang)- “What Should I Do with My Life”, by Po Bronson is first up.   I’m on chapter one.  no comment so far.

lot’s of travel being planned.  trip to the west coast in feb, with a journey to visit the old homestead.  trying to figure out a route that includes Reno/Tahoe as well, otherwise the injun casino will have to do.  there is a bigger one south of rocktown that we never tried - might be a good idea now that I think about it.

big ‘work’ trip in march coming up - west coast/vegas, with a quick stop in SD to see Tom in all his glory.  last hurrah before he becomes a father.  we are calling it his baby shower.

portfolio action not as bad as I thought.  online merchants reporting decent numbers, so SMOOG is  back up, along with some other online holdings (WIIBAY, AMAZING).  arrrrriba also didn’t report doom and gloom, so there was a small bounce after the announcement.  hopefully it holds into tomorrow so I can get out!  might have to wake up at 4:30am to make it happen.

I also meant to comment on Linda Lingle’s state of the state.  nothing much said (not surprising), although a small case of deja vu when it came to her plans for education.  I’ll have a long one on that subject.

baby is turning 2 in a few days!  nothing much planned since she doesn’t know any better.  I think the plan is to regift some of the xmas presents she still hasn’t opened.  that’s what happens when the house is small, yet you are still spoiled with all the material possessions you can handle.  if you forget you had it, haveing it regifted is the same as getting it the first time!

time to get on with the day.  I will return to fill out the details later.

buy 500 GOATSE MAR 95 CALL @ $3.78

Monday, January 22nd, 2007

I think it’s time to convert my portfolio into one that looks like it came out of a magazine - small mix of funds, and a few blue chippers here and there.  active trading is doing me no good these days.

one of the biggest problems, is that to catch the opening of the market, I have to wake up at 4:00 am HST.  that’s just not going to happen.

culturally, it seems like people in Hawaii - at least my family/friends, and coworkers here at the ‘hou - are just not tuned in to the market.  not like the bay area tech crowd I used to hang with.  I wouldn’t say we were addicted to money, but the market was definitely fun.  just an extension of gambling I guess.

so what happens is that 1) I start to ignore whole sections of my portfolio, 2) no chit-chat means no leads or shared research, and 3) bad impulsive moves around market activity.

(more…)

gravy in my veins

Friday, January 19th, 2007

so I had a Personal Health Assessment a few weeks ago. apparently, I’m not as close to death as I thought. getting older has the advantage of moving up the scale in terms of allowable fat and girth.one area I apparently have to work on is my cholesterol. not even good, too much bad. it’s to be expected with my diet, and lack of general activity I suppose, but the logic the assessors used to explain this to me seems flawed. apparently, various medical guidelines have been adjusted in recent years, so levels of blood pressure, cholesterol, etc. that used to be within acceptable levels (and would have been for some time), are now borderline indicators for future problems. my numbers would have been fine 2 years ago, but today, I’m borderline hypertensive, and borderline high cholesterol. I felt I was straddling a fence so to speak - I must not have been so good in the old measures if I can just be adjusted over the line, but I can’t be terrible with the new measures either, since I am still right next to the ‘healthy’ block. “nope,” the assesors tell me. “You can’t bargain with God.” (that comment surprised me, but it’s what the lady said!). I wasn’t bargaining with God though was I? I was testing the guidelines this lady was presenting to me as canon. I’m pretty sure God can take me, good cholesterol numbers or not.
(more…)

blogging for votes - update

Friday, January 19th, 2007

looks like the grass roots lobbying provision was struck out of the bill it appeared in.  interesting to see which side of the aisle was in favor of this one.

this dual party system of ours is killing the republic.  the more entrenched we become in it, the more radical a position each party must take to define it’s “base”.

in this instance, the GOP, acting as ‘libertarians’ voted for freedom from extraneous legislation, although recent history has shown they are more adept at taking advantage of such mechanisms, and I’m sure that played a role.

the jackasses on the other hand, acting as ‘morons’, which they often do, wanted to play the role of playground monitor, so they look for legislation that might level the field, and paint it red, white, & blue - the colors of the patriot act, out to protect you from subservise lobbying.

48 republicans plus 8 dems (not Hawaii’s) voted to strike the provision.  that means probably 8 sane people in office right now.

so let’s give it up for the US Senate - just looking out for your pipes!

clerks ][ - a][m

Friday, January 19th, 2007

so, after mocking my movie watching in his blog, Tom IMs me and tells how funny Clerks 2 is. wtf. it was close to the top of the spool though, so I threw it in to see if I can trust Tom’s opinion.
past reccomendations make this one suspect. first of all, most of his past movie watching experience was from watching cam movies for fucks sake. and then there was ‘Better Luck Tomorrow’, his all time hype film that I wasted money on.

the other thing this flick has working against it, is time and its own history. Clerks is like the slacker Star Wars. like Star Wars, its fans can’t wait for the sequel, but you know the sequel has no chance to live up to the mystique of the original. we alreayd know Jay and Silent Bob, Dante has put on about 40 fucking pounds, and well, Kevin Smith is just not a nobody anymore.

it was fun to watch the original team in action though. Smith’s feeble attempt at a story line didn’t really affect anything, since you were just waiting to see which fuckhead was going to do the next fucked up thing (like the language? it’s inspired by the movie)

I’m also not sure if Smith was copying luca$ on purpose or what, but some of the dialog was pathetic - especially the quasi-homo love soliloquy Randal drops on Dante near the end. for fucks sake.

ultimately, not a lot of knee slappers, but plenty of crudely crafted humour that only a fan would appreciate. I’m a fan. twas appreciated.

final words: shut the fuck up gobot, you never go A2M!

new card, new identity

Thursday, January 18th, 2007

I would love to know what kind of language the credit card companies use to describe customers.  often, if you can learn an industry’s venacular, you can understand how/why you are treated the way you often are - good and bad.  for example, finer hotels will always refer to their customers as ‘guests’, even in the back office.  this use of language permeates the operation, and should manifest itself towards the ‘guest’ as ‘hospitality.’

having been bombarded with mileage bonus offers from CitiBank for quite some time, I thought I might as well take them up on one of the offers, and open up a new business account, since I didn’t have one, I technically have a business, and the miles would be applied to my personal AAdvantage account.  25,000 miles if I keep the card for a year, and spend $2,500.00.  not bad - that is 1 free domestic round trip right there! plus, they waive the fee ($50) the first year.
now, most financial rags will warn you off mileage cards as not being worth it.  how you should focus on cash back or rebate cards if you do not carry a balance, since you can never get fair value for your spending with miles.  in my case though, Daddy works for American, and so we always get more than our share of ugprades and the like.  also, we save up miles to use in huge amounts - last time I cashed miles, it was 250,000 for 2 first class tickets to Japan.  retail value was over $20,000, and to be honest, discount value was not much less.  in this regard, I am well ahead of the game.

so I fill out the application, and send it off, and a couple weeks later, my new card shows up.  as I call to activate it, I notice my credit limit is set to $500.00.  If I was an 18 year old kid, and this was my first card, I’d understand the low limit (in fact, I believe my first card was a $500 limit), but I have years of excellent credit history, I’m already a CitiBank customer, and this is a ‘Platinum Business Card’.  I’ve had dinners that cost more than $500.00, what kind of business expenditures can I incur with this?

anyway, I call the AAdvantage Business customer support line just to make sure it wasn’t a typo, and sure enough - $500.00.  The friendly agent asks though, ‘are you a current Citi customer, because sometimes they issue a single line of credit, and split it amongst the accounts.’  fair enough - I give her my other account number and she looks it up.  ‘Looks like you have more credit on the other card, would you like to transfer some of it to this one?’  sure, I say, what’s the line on the other one?  ‘$26,500.00.’

so, clearly, there is an imbalance, and the agent puts in the order to transfer some of the credit - I certainly didn’t need any more.  but c’mon, that should be an even more obvious sign that sending me another card with a $500 limit will either be received as a slap in the face, or (in my case) seen as a useless piece of plastic I don’t know what to do with.

I will say though, more kudos than complaints for this issue.  first of all, even if it’s not a seperate group of people answering the ‘AAdvantage Business Card Customer Support Hotline,’ I appreciate the effort to distinguish you from the crowd when you call.  also, calling during the hot time still only had me waiting about 1 minute to talk to a human.  finally, the lady had a good idea on her first try, and then started the solution ball rolling.  I think AA pushes the branding thing, because all their partners set up ‘AAdvantage Hotlines’, but Citi has always done me right with cards and mortgages.  I often get them to waive the annual fee just by asking.

thumbs up all around.

blogging for votes

Wednesday, January 17th, 2007

not sure how accurate this is, but it’s a sad day when you have to start registering to write your thoughts down in a public forum.  another example of how the ruling class in our society is out of touch with the common man.  takes a special kind to decide to fix the tubes.

blogging is like radio - you potentially reach millions, but only if people actively tune in.  clearly this legislation requires a lot more definition before it can be enforced in any way.  of course, this leads to one of 2 probably evils:

1)  definition IS NOT included, and the ambiguity is potentially used to bully ‘the new press’ around

2)  definition IS included, but with such a horrible understanding of technology and the paradigm, that it is potentially used to bully ‘the new press’

and haliburton somehow gets paid.

well, while I still have the right to  express my political agendas without a formal lobby, I’ll share this thought:

‘FUCK YOU’

that is all.

life will change

Wednesday, January 17th, 2007

having a kid definitely changes your lifestyle. not that I lived an exciting life before, but now my recreational activities are limited to things I can do between the hours of 8:00 pm and 6:00 am - in the house. have to be always on call to answer the cries! thus, my life is made up of simple pleasures, like watching movies.

blogging about movie watching is certainly not exciting, but it is my sad pathetic life, although I must question those that blog about bloggers blogging about watching movies. you are then observing someone who is boring - that is like sitting around watching grass grow, then blaming the grass!!

I should also add that part of the purpose of recording the movie reviews was that I will eventually need the data for an app I am working on for the ‘hou - a point I made in my first movie post, which I can easily review for confirmation!   I don’t want to have to sit down in the future and just make up 50 reviews.
anyway, this is just a phase. I rarely have time to watch movies, since I try to fill my time with personal development activities, or life activity planning. when you get to 2 full spools though, time to work some of it down!
we will see though, as others experience the life changing events of parenthood. watching an entire movie in one sitting will become part of living life!